High heels without the heel!! Sounds like a revolutionary idea!! The wave of the future!! Nope, it’s retarded:

1. They’re not cute, they’re awkward looking. I’m guessing the person wearing them would be equally as awkward looking.

2. They’re bad for your back and feet according to Michael Paynton, chairman of the British Chiropody and Podiatry Association, who had this to say: “The heel is there to stabilise. When you elevate the rear of the foot it makes you lean forward, which is bad for both the back and the foot. The front of the foot ends up taking the weight of the bulk of your body, which can in turn do damage to the tendons in your legs by shortening them. I certainly would not recommend these shoes.”

3. They cost 1800 pounds, which is roughly $3600 USD. I would rather use $3600 for things that don’t cause back and foot injury….a tropical getaway? A shopping spree? 3,600 one dollar bills to put in the g-strings of Chippendale dancers? All much better ways to spend your money.

If you simply must have them, you will join the ranks of celebrities that have flocked to have this new item of “coolness” like Posh Spice and Gwyneth Paltrow, but in the eyes of Average Chicks everywhere, you’re still insane.